Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MoodyP's avatar

I just sit on my ounces, with an avg cost of about $20 and watch all the machinations swirl.

Metals have been manipulated for 1000s of years. Since the first King clipped a coin.

There is little doubt that Bessent had a hand in telling the bullion banks to close their shorts and stand down on gold, allowing the FED and Treasury to see what would occur to the price. And then they rug pulled before it got out of hand. Now they know and future policy will flow from this knowledge.

Silver followed.

It’s really that simple.

DemocracyDenier's avatar

"A market that has been pushed far beyond sustainable levels doesn’t need much help collapsing. It has already been loaded with the financial equivalent of dynamite."

The S&P500, Nasdaq, Mag7 etc. which by almost any metric you choose are massively overvalued, are still posting ATHs regularly. So, the above is nonsense.

This, however:

"After watching financial markets for decades, I’ve come to believe that understanding the behavior of market participants is often more valuable than knowing everything about the underlying asset. You can memorize every silver supply statistic, study every mine in Mexico and calculate industrial consumption to the last ounce. And you can still lose a fortune if you don’t understand who owns the paper, how much leverage they’re carrying and what happens when they’re forced to sell."

You tell us that the fundamentals haven't changed and so silver is still a massive opportunity, and yet here you basically are saying that none of that matters because of how market participants (read: people with VERY deep pockets) behave on an ongoing basis.

Let's see you resolve these contradictions before you go on positing theories about where the silver price is going to end up.

2 more comments...

Ready for more?