Ann Barnhardt – Marxists Are Weak And Helpless And Useless

from FinancialSurvivalNet

Ann Barnhardt is probably one of the few moral and honest people left in the financial industry. As you may know, after the collapse of MF Global, she closed her commodities brokerage house because she felt that her clients’ money was no longer safe. Now the 7th Circuit has affirmed her belief, upholding these exact practices in the notorious Sentinel case, which will become the precedent for letting the Corzine crime family off the hook. Basically the Court says it’s okay to steal customer funds as long as you didn’t intend to steal them. In other words, it’s okay to be a thief if didn’t want to become a thief. So when people entrust their hard earned dollars with you, and you’re losing money on all your derivatives, go ahead and take their money, you won’t go to jail over it or even be held liable.

Which is why Ann says that Marxists are the most weak and helpless creatures on the planet and they will suffer their just reward.

Click Here to Listen to the Audio

Sign up (on the right side) for the instant free Financial Survival Toolkit and free weekly newsletter.

9 comments to Ann Barnhardt – Marxists Are Weak And Helpless And Useless

  • Ann actually makes a FANTASTIC point about how the deeply religious always look at calamity as the return of Jesus… You need look no further than the Battle Hymn of the Republic, written during the civil war:

    Imagine the carnage and horror of the civil war… Out of THAT horror, came these lyrics:

    Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord:
    He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
    He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:
    His truth is marching on.

    (Chorus)
    Glory, glory, hallelujah!


  • Ubetcha

    Her rants seem sane at times. But even an egg beater sprays straight once in a while. Wanna see the real Ann Barnhardt, ask her a question about what really happened on 9/11, and then enjoy the show.

  • Ubetcha

    Moderation, is that a new 1st ammendment restriction?

    • Firstly, I have no choice BUT to moderate the comments… you have NO IDEA how much spam I have to filter out. I don’t filter out opinions, just people trying to use the comments section to hot-link back to their own site, or sell some dumb sh!t that has nothing to do with this site…

      Secondly, the first amendment gives you the right to speak your mind without being arrested by the government, and locked in a cage. It doesn’t have a fucking thing to do with website comments going unmoderated in spam-land. Learn the constitution, THEN beak in my ear. Until then, you’re an airhead.

  • edwardwills

    God damn, haha

  • Ubetcha

    I’m not a professional commentor. I didn’t realize that you have to do all of those things to make sure a comment was just a comment. And I had no idea what the term “moderating” meant either. So now I do. With insults included. Are you Ann Barnhardts’ boy friend? She has the same twisted attitude. She can go on and on about what she thinks happened with Jon Corizine and it most likely did, but ask her about a subject that in her one one track mind she refuses to address, like 9/11 and see what happens. Seriously, do it. I guess people just put her on a program for entertainment only overlooking faults. And if that’s not the reason they put her on, they need to look a little closer at their own depth of reason. And go ahead, go into another rant like the last reply. It puts a face on the moderator where none could be seen before.

    • You’re the one that chose to smart-off about how the comment moderation was trampling on your first amendment rights. Don’t blame me that I lost all respect for you a day ago.

  • Lore

    Outstanding interview. This lady GETS IT. Wow.

    I suspect Ms. Barnhardt just mapped out America’s future for the next 30-50 years, at a high level at least. This interview is a keeper.

    Thank you Kerry and Ann!

  • 7Towers

    I think Ann described the MF global Corzine affair with profound articulation. She was able to convey in just under 29 minutes what actually took place, the ramifications to all those affected, explaining concepts in the most efficient manner that even a lay person understood the enormity of what had just taken place.
    If Ann doesn’t wish to speak about 9-11 what is that to you? If you are confident in your appraisal that should be enough.
    I want to reiterate she is able to convey complex information, the gravity of the initial insult as well as the ensuing consequences conciseness that is rarely seen.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>